I'm not for it but I can live with it and even though deep down it angers me I will remain calm and come the first weekend in September I will be in the stands shaking my pom cheering on the Ole Miss team that takes the field.
Whoever they may be.

Moderator: Rebel Security
Yea, I am not worked up over the whole mascot thing either, but just wanted to offer my belief that it is very much a political thing...guess it could be worse, they could be throwing around Jar Jar Binks....rebelliousb wrote:1OLEMISSREBEL wrote:Well, said RebChuck and FelicianaReb!!!
Everything is political these days and it all ends in stalemate. We should all be willing to budge a little in every aspect. Even so, as far as this subject goes, let's allow your sig line to sink in.
hear! Hear! But they will be our beloved Rebels...just replacing one silly cartoon like character with another. Just think if our fathers and grandfathers had raise this much hell when "the administrstion" allowed SPORTS WRITERS to change our name fr the Flood to the Rebels.cacreb2000 wrote:As much as I like things the way they were at games and around campus as long as I have attended, I am first and foremost a REBEL. Always will be, and I will continue to support Ole Miss regardless of how this turns out.
I'm not for it but I can live with it and even though deep down it angers me I will remain calm and come the first weekend in September I will be in the stands shaking my pom cheering on the Ole Miss team that takes the field.
Whoever they may be.
He is an Ibis, dude, the most intimidating of all sea faring avian. Just kiddingrebelliousb wrote:hear! Hear! But they will be our beloved Rebels...just replacing one silly cartoon like character with another. Just think if our fathers and grandfathers had raise this much hell when "the administrstion" allowed SPORTS WRITERS to change our name fr the Flood to the Rebels.cacreb2000 wrote:As much as I like things the way they were at games and around campus as long as I have attended, I am first and foremost a REBEL. Always will be, and I will continue to support Ole Miss regardless of how this turns out.
I'm not for it but I can live with it and even though deep down it angers me I will remain calm and come the first weekend in September I will be in the stands shaking my pom cheering on the Ole Miss team that takes the field.
Whoever they may be.
So we have a cartoon bear or coyote...and maybe a real one. The U has a duck... I don't think of ducks with hurricane warnings and they don't intimidate me.
I agree with you, Sas. Everything lately seems to slip and slide into a coming apocalypse. Stop worrying so much about all this. As of today, we aren't changing any of our nicknames. We're not changing our colors. It's just not that big a deal in the grand scheme of things. What man can add a single hour to his life by worrying? Also, I'm so sick of these administration conspiracy theories--I feel like I'm reading a bunch of JFK 9/11 Area 51 mess.Sasquatch wrote:Ummmm, when did anybody say anything about getting rid of the name "Rebels"? And please...let's not get into ANOTHER series of political slippery slope discussions here. This is NOT, I repeat, NOT a political issue. It's a school spirit issue. So stop trying to make it into one. And if the discussion here becomes as contentious as it was in the Fall with the whole "TWSRA" BS, I'm just gonna have to leave here until it simmers down again. I ALMOST came completely unglued on a couple of folks then, and I'm NOT going to let that happen again.colreb74 wrote:It's a Sad day to be a Rebel. Or whatever the hell we are now! I guess "Rebel" is a name of the past. Since our Mascot will change, what will we be? The Mississippi Liberals. Obama as our mascot???
Well said. Thank you.rrlynch wrote:BEGIN SOAPBOX
A few things:
They're not getting rid of the name "Rebels". They have been very clear about this so, until they say they're going to do this, all of the complaints about it aren't warranted.
And yes, it is political. What isn't these days? However, it isn't the politics many of y'all are alluding to. It isn't the "liberal PC crowd" politics; it's the "let's be pragmatic about our univerisity" academic politics. Getting rid of the confederate imagery betters our university and, vicariously, the state. Consider the following:
-Ole Miss' Phi Beta Kappa chapter
-The Honors College
-The Department of Public Policy and Leadership
-The Thad Chochran Research Center
-The Croft Institute
-The Center for Southern Studies
-The new residential colleges
-The Fed Ex Academic Support Center
-The Gertrude Castellow Ford Center (where the debate was held)
-Significant expansion of football, baseball, and basketball facilities
-More successful programs in football and baseball
-An endowment nearing a half of a billion dollars
Unless I'm mistaken, every single one of these things are new developments. None of them have been around longer than 10-15 years, with many being only a few years old. These things are the very selling points the university uses to bring in new students, professors, and (here's the kicker) donations.
When we had the confederate flag at games, Dixie as an "unofficial fight song", Colonel Reb, etc., big time donors and corporate sponsors didn't want a d*** thing to do with Ole Miss. I know this because my father worked for the medical school from 1993 until just a few years ago. He heard this from Khayat, Jones, and every other significant administrator Ole Miss has had during that time span. Ever since we've distanced ourselves from the Old South imagery, we've done nothing but improve our university as an organization which educates and eventually betters the State of Mississippi.
I recently heard the story of Chancellor Gerald Turner trying to get a Phi Beta Kappa chapter to Ole Miss in the early 1990's(if it's not true or if I'm missing some details, please correct me). The story basically goes like this: Gerald Turner approaches PBK, asks "why can't we have a chapter?", to which they reply "because we don't want to associate ourselves with the Confederate imagery." Story goes that they specifically cited the Confederate Flag when speaking to Turner. I know some may say "well I don't care what they think," but Phi Beta Kappa is the single most prestigious honor society in the nation. Every university wants to establish a PBK chapter, but few are given that opportunity. Of the eight State schools in Mississippi, Ole Miss is the only one that can boast a PBK chapter. That's huge, and we have it because we took a step away from the past.
Look, Colonel Reb doesn't bother me. I own stuff with the Colonel on it and am not ashamed of this. I do, however, see how removing ourselves from these ever so precious "traditions" only benefits us in the long run. I'm not giving in to the "PC Police" or Barack Obama or whoever y'all think may be behind this; I'm being practical. I want to improve Ole Miss.
We all claim to love Ole Miss, but few of us are actually acting like it right now.
Hotty Toddy! Go Rebels Go!
END SOAPBOX
rrlynch wrote:BEGIN SOAPBOX
A few things:
They're not getting rid of the name "Rebels". They have been very clear about this so, until they say they're going to do this, all of the complaints about it aren't warranted.
And yes, it is political. What isn't these days? However, it isn't the politics many of y'all are alluding to. It isn't the "liberal PC crowd" politics; it's the "let's be pragmatic about our univerisity" academic politics. Getting rid of the confederate imagery betters our university and, vicariously, the state. Consider the following:
-Ole Miss' Phi Beta Kappa chapter
-The Honors College
-The Department of Public Policy and Leadership
-The Thad Chochran Research Center
-The Croft Institute
-The Center for Southern Studies
-The new residential colleges
-The Fed Ex Academic Support Center
-The Gertrude Castellow Ford Center (where the debate was held)
-Significant expansion of football, baseball, and basketball facilities
-More successful programs in football and baseball
-An endowment nearing a half of a billion dollars
Unless I'm mistaken, every single one of these things are new developments. None of them have been around longer than 10-15 years, with many being only a few years old. These things are the very selling points the university uses to bring in new students, professors, and (here's the kicker) donations.
When we had the confederate flag at games, Dixie as an "unofficial fight song", Colonel Reb, etc., big time donors and corporate sponsors didn't want a d*** thing to do with Ole Miss. I know this because my father worked for the medical school from 1993 until just a few years ago. He heard this from Khayat, Jones, and every other significant administrator Ole Miss has had during that time span. Ever since we've distanced ourselves from the Old South imagery, we've done nothing but improve our university as an organization which educates and eventually betters the State of Mississippi.
I recently heard the story of Chancellor Gerald Turner trying to get a Phi Beta Kappa chapter to Ole Miss in the early 1990's(if it's not true or if I'm missing some details, please correct me). The story basically goes like this: Gerald Turner approaches PBK, asks "why can't we have a chapter?", to which they reply "because we don't want to associate ourselves with the Confederate imagery." Story goes that they specifically cited the Confederate Flag when speaking to Turner. I know some may say "well I don't care what they think," but Phi Beta Kappa is the single most prestigious honor society in the nation. Every university wants to establish a PBK chapter, but few are given that opportunity. Of the eight State schools in Mississippi, Ole Miss is the only one that can boast a PBK chapter. That's huge, and we have it because we took a step away from the past.
Look, Colonel Reb doesn't bother me. I own stuff with the Colonel on it and am not ashamed of this. I do, however, see how removing ourselves from these ever so precious "traditions" only benefits us in the long run. I'm not giving in to the "PC Police" or Barack Obama or whoever y'all think may be behind this; I'm being practical. I want to improve Ole Miss.
We all claim to love Ole Miss, but few of us are actually acting like it right now.
Hotty Toddy! Go Rebels Go!
END SOAPBOX
As a prospective student, I for one can tell you that all those programs that you listed have been VERY instrumental in drawing me towards Ole Miss. If it wasn't for the Honors College, the Lott Institute, the Residential Colleges, Ole Miss wouldn't even be on my radar. I loved Colonel Reb. But I understand the need to move on.rrlynch wrote:BEGIN SOAPBOX
A few things:
They're not getting rid of the name "Rebels". They have been very clear about this so, until they say they're going to do this, all of the complaints about it aren't warranted.
And yes, it is political. What isn't these days? However, it isn't the politics many of y'all are alluding to. It isn't the "liberal PC crowd" politics; it's the "let's be pragmatic about our univerisity" academic politics. Getting rid of the confederate imagery betters our university and, vicariously, the state. Consider the following:
-Ole Miss' Phi Beta Kappa chapter
-The Honors College
-The Department of Public Policy and Leadership
-The Thad Chochran Research Center
-The Croft Institute
-The Center for Southern Studies
-The new residential colleges
-The Fed Ex Academic Support Center
-The Gertrude Castellow Ford Center (where the debate was held)
-Significant expansion of football, baseball, and basketball facilities
-More successful programs in football and baseball
-An endowment nearing a half of a billion dollars
Unless I'm mistaken, every single one of these things are new developments. None of them have been around longer than 10-15 years, with many being only a few years old. These things are the very selling points the university uses to bring in new students, professors, and (here's the kicker) donations.
When we had the confederate flag at games, Dixie as an "unofficial fight song", Colonel Reb, etc., big time donors and corporate sponsors didn't want a d*** thing to do with Ole Miss. I know this because my father worked for the medical school from 1993 until just a few years ago. He heard this from Khayat, Jones, and every other significant administrator Ole Miss has had during that time span. Ever since we've distanced ourselves from the Old South imagery, we've done nothing but improve our university as an organization which educates and eventually betters the State of Mississippi.
I recently heard the story of Chancellor Gerald Turner trying to get a Phi Beta Kappa chapter to Ole Miss in the early 1990's(if it's not true or if I'm missing some details, please correct me). The story basically goes like this: Gerald Turner approaches PBK, asks "why can't we have a chapter?", to which they reply "because we don't want to associate ourselves with the Confederate imagery." Story goes that they specifically cited the Confederate Flag when speaking to Turner. I know some may say "well I don't care what they think," but Phi Beta Kappa is the single most prestigious honor society in the nation. Every university wants to establish a PBK chapter, but few are given that opportunity. Of the eight State schools in Mississippi, Ole Miss is the only one that can boast a PBK chapter. That's huge, and we have it because we took a step away from the past.
Look, Colonel Reb doesn't bother me. I own stuff with the Colonel on it and am not ashamed of this. I do, however, see how removing ourselves from these ever so precious "traditions" only benefits us in the long run. I'm not giving in to the "PC Police" or Barack Obama or whoever y'all think may be behind this; I'm being practical. I want to improve Ole Miss.
We all claim to love Ole Miss, but few of us are actually acting like it right now.
Hotty Toddy! Go Rebels Go!
END SOAPBOX
Couldn't agree more!Rebchuck18 wrote:I am not all in knots over Colonel rebel being gone (FDWL is another thing though)...and I am all for moving on, but the way we seem to move on always does more dragging up of baggage than it does heading down a path....and I think that this is done in some ways on purpose so that they can eventually get rid of anything and everything....they never let sleeing dogs lie...they always kick 'em in the butt right on the point that causes the most barking.....
Instead of building off of the wonderful things about Ole Miss that RRLynch referred to, they seem to do their damndest to just stir up the old crap...let that *beep* be and quit scraping the scab and making a little scratch become a festering wound!
You're trying to prove a point by presenting an absurd hypothetical. I'm trying to prove a point by citing actual events which have happened. Please don't mislead people in the forum with this tactic. I don't think you realize just how much Ole Miss struggled to even stay accredited during the 60's-80's, let alone operate in the black. And to reduce my argument to "hey let's do this and we'll get money" is (once again) misleading and, frankly, insulting. While money is the fuel this engine runs on, the changes I proposed aren't simply expressed with "Ole Miss has more money." Because of all of the new opportunities Ole Miss has opened to itself, the value of an Ole Miss degree has increased and the everyday student experience is more enriching and unique than ever.Leibniz wrote:Since we're being pragmatic and doing what takes to get more money, why not just sell the mascot and the nickname to the highest bidder. Ole miss could be the Fed Ex Airmen or the Nike Just Do Its. Other departments could grab sponsors as well. Pfizer could sponsor the pharmacy school. The sky is the limit. Just think of all the good that could be done.
Anyone hear the saying "the things you own, end up owning you?"
The way many are willing to trash their families and culture's traditions so they may take the green stuff from whomever is willing to give it is a scary and sad thing.