Prediction: Arky score

Football Related Discussions

Moderator: Rebel Security

User avatar
JustBlues
Rebel Legend
Rebel Legend
Posts: 3571
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 9:12 am

Rebchuck18 wrote:Because of arkys defense, we may look better than we actually are in this game. We may even score 20.....but unlike us Arky has an SEC quarterback, so they may hang another half a hundred on us.
Arky had an SEC QB last year and we had a worse pass defense than this year's yet they didn't score half a hundred then (even though they had Knile Davis who had a career day to compliment that SEC QB) and I don't think they do now. We'll see come Saturday.
Rebchuck18
Rebel Legend
Rebel Legend
Posts: 5414
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 11:19 pm
Location: Oxford, MS

JustBlues wrote:
Rebchuck18 wrote:Because of arkys defense, we may look better than we actually are in this game. We may even score 20.....but unlike us Arky has an SEC quarterback, so they may hang another half a hundred on us.
Arky had an SEC QB last year and we had a worse pass defense than this year's yet they didn't score half a hundred then (even though they had Knile Davis who had a career day to compliment that SEC QB) and I don't think they do now. We'll see come Saturday.
I personally think this guy is better than Mallett and I said they "may" score 50. If we could keep them in the 20s it might be a ballgame, just not real confident we can.
User avatar
JustBlues
Rebel Legend
Rebel Legend
Posts: 3571
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 9:12 am

Rebchuck18 wrote:
JustBlues wrote:
Rebchuck18 wrote:Because of arkys defense, we may look better than we actually are in this game. We may even score 20.....but unlike us Arky has an SEC quarterback, so they may hang another half a hundred on us.
Arky had an SEC QB last year and we had a worse pass defense than this year's yet they didn't score half a hundred then (even though they had Knile Davis who had a career day to compliment that SEC QB) and I don't think they do now. We'll see come Saturday.
I personally think this guy is better than Mallett and I said they "may" score 50. If we could keep them in the 20s it might be a ballgame, just not real confident we can.
This guy is better than Mallet was at the same point in his career. This guy now is not better than Mallet last year at this point in the season. At least that's my opinion for what it's worth.
Rebchuck18
Rebel Legend
Rebel Legend
Posts: 5414
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 11:19 pm
Location: Oxford, MS

JustBlues wrote:
Rebchuck18 wrote: I personally think this guy is better than Mallett and I said they "may" score 50. If we could keep them in the 20s it might be a ballgame, just not real confident we can.
This guy is better than Mallet was at the same point in his career. This guy now is not better than Mallet last year at this point in the season. At least that's my opinion for what it's worth.
Yea their qb ratings are close. Wilson will probably have less tds than mallet but also less interceptions. He just appears to not make some of the careless throws that mallet made but believe me I would take either one 8)
User avatar
A10Rebel
3rd String
3rd String
Posts: 579
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 10:02 am

Ark - 45

Ole Miss - 7
"Be miserable. Or motivate yourself. Whatever has to be done, it's always your choice."
-Wayne Dyer
User avatar
proud2breb
Rebel Legend
Rebel Legend
Posts: 2969
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2011 10:07 am

A10Rebel wrote:Ark - 45

Ole Miss - 7
I agree with this one
User avatar
spudhog
3rd String
3rd String
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:41 am

Rebchuck18 wrote:
JustBlues wrote:
Rebchuck18 wrote: I personally think this guy is better than Mallett and I said they "may" score 50. If we could keep them in the 20s it might be a ballgame, just not real confident we can.
This guy is better than Mallet was at the same point in his career. This guy now is not better than Mallet last year at this point in the season. At least that's my opinion for what it's worth.
Yea their qb ratings are close. Wilson will probably have less tds than mallet but also less interceptions. He just appears to not make some of the careless throws that mallet made but believe me I would take either one 8)
They are different if that make much sense considering they are both pro style qb's. Mallett was obviously more seasoned than TW and had a stronger arm (not much though). Tyler is a natural QB. He's instictual and just very smooth at times. He's just not as experienced (pointed out correctly in an above post) and it shows sometimes. There's a reason Mallett started last year and there's a reason we really like TW now. TW can definitely move a lot better than Mallett. Which, is probably the most obvious difference.
Rebchuck18
Rebel Legend
Rebel Legend
Posts: 5414
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 11:19 pm
Location: Oxford, MS

spudhog wrote:
They are different if that make much sense considering they are both pro style qb's. Mallett was obviously more seasoned than TW and had a stronger arm (not much though). Tyler is a natural QB. He's instictual and just very smooth at times. He's just not as experienced (pointed out correctly in an above post) and it shows sometimes. There's a reason Mallett started last year and there's a reason we really like TW now. TW can definitely move a lot better than Mallett. Which, is probably the most obvious difference.
I obviously havent watched them as closely as you but this guy looks smarter to me than mallett (in a football sense)
Joe
Rebel Recruit
Rebel Recruit
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:00 pm

I'd like to think the home field gives us an edge. Then I remember last Saturday. Maybe not so much.

I'm going out on a limb, and say we lose - but we at least keep it close.

We lose by 8.
User avatar
proud2breb
Rebel Legend
Rebel Legend
Posts: 2969
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2011 10:07 am

Joe wrote:I'd like to think the home field gives us an edge. Then I remember last Saturday. Maybe not so much.

I'm going out on a limb, and say we lose - but we at least keep it close.

We lose by 8.
What you talking about. Home field definately gives us an edge. We'd have lost by at least 80 pts in T-town!
Joe
Rebel Recruit
Rebel Recruit
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:00 pm

proud2breb wrote:
Joe wrote:I'd like to think the home field gives us an edge. Then I remember last Saturday. Maybe not so much.

I'm going out on a limb, and say we lose - but we at least keep it close.

We lose by 8.
What you talking about. Home field definately gives us an edge. We'd have lost by at least 80 pts in T-town!
:lol:

Dark humor. Noted, and appreciated.
User avatar
spudhog
3rd String
3rd String
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:41 am

Rebchuck18 wrote:
spudhog wrote:
They are different if that make much sense considering they are both pro style qb's. Mallett was obviously more seasoned than TW and had a stronger arm (not much though). Tyler is a natural QB. He's instictual and just very smooth at times. He's just not as experienced (pointed out correctly in an above post) and it shows sometimes. There's a reason Mallett started last year and there's a reason we really like TW now. TW can definitely move a lot better than Mallett. Which, is probably the most obvious difference.
I obviously havent watched them as closely as you but this guy looks smarter to me than mallett (in a football sense)
Mallett wasn't the best of "interviews". But, if you watched that John Gruden show. He knew a lot more about football than the rest of those characters did. Doesn't mean he's the best QB of all of them but he knows his football.

I think TW is safer than Mallett at this age. Meaning, Mallett had that rocket arm he trusted live or die. TW isn't quite as cavalier with his arm (which is nothing to laugh at). So, that may come off more intelligent sometimes. He's only getting better which makes it fun to watch.
User avatar
cacreb2000
3rd String
3rd String
Posts: 586
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:20 pm
Location: Oxford
Contact:

Used to be Nutts. 44 This is Nutts. 13
HOTTY TODDY!!!
GO REBELS!!!
User avatar
JustBlues
Rebel Legend
Rebel Legend
Posts: 3571
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 9:12 am

Arkansas has a very good pass game, but they have benefitted from facing some absolutely abysmal pass defenses. They have only faced one good pass defense. Now, our pass defense is better than last year's, but I wouldn't rate it as "good". However, it is probably better than most of the ones Arkansas has played. They will gain some serious yardage on us but it won't be the blowout that some here are predicting.
User avatar
cajunrebel
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3444
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 8:28 am
Location: Houston, Texas b/c of Nawlins

Losing - 13

Losers - 38
"I'm a solid verbal."

- Prospect name here
Post Reply