next head coach predictions and wishes

Football Related Discussions

Moderator: Rebel Security

metalinc
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 398
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:20 pm
Location: Omaha,ne

He is 26-14 and they have been to bowls but they have lost each one with losses to LSU Iowa and Airforce. They were 2009 ACC champions..which was stripped by NCAA violations..16-8 in conference..I think he is a good steady winner in conf out of conference so so. I dunno...take a lot of convincing.
User avatar
rebel556677
Scout Team
Scout Team
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Atlanta, Ga.

This year Johnson at Georgia Tech has a quarterback who can run the triple option and is an accurate passer with a strong arm which makes the entire playbook viable.
Just another day being better than State.
User avatar
MageeRebel425
Rebel Legend
Rebel Legend
Posts: 3195
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 10:36 pm

metalinc wrote:He is 26-14 and they have been to bowls but they have lost each one with losses to LSU Iowa and Airforce. They were 2009 ACC champions..which was stripped by NCAA violations..16-8 in conference..I think he is a good steady winner in conf out of conference so so. I dunno...take a lot of convincing.

The problem with running the triple option is that its not a very sexy brand of football. Its hard for an average fan to get pumped about a triple option offense. I like Paul Johnson and think he is a good football coach but if we are going with gimmicky offenses I would rather have the mad scientist, Leach. Imagine that offense with athletic WRs and backs.. At least I would be confident any given week that my coach would be smarter than the other guy. I know Nutt beat Leach heads up but really our D-line and talent beat Leach. Would want a great D coordinator to come with him though, and he would have to run the ball more a little more in the SEC...
User avatar
JustBlues
Rebel Legend
Rebel Legend
Posts: 3571
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 9:12 am

MageeRebel425 wrote:The problem with running the triple option is that its not a very sexy brand of football. Its hard for an average fan to get pumped about a triple option offense...
win a championship and it won't matter how "sexy" your offense is-- fans will get excited. In the end, "sexy" is whatever wins football games.
User avatar
MageeRebel425
Rebel Legend
Rebel Legend
Posts: 3195
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 10:36 pm

JustBlues wrote:
MageeRebel425 wrote:The problem with running the triple option is that its not a very sexy brand of football. Its hard for an average fan to get pumped about a triple option offense...
win a championship and it won't matter how "sexy" your offense is-- fans will get excited. In the end, "sexy" is whatever wins football games.

I can agree with that from the fan's perspective, but elite 17 and 18 year olds are not going to jump stumps to play for a school that runs a triple option. I am not convinced it would work in the SEC. The one strength of our team on paper for the future is at wr. If we hired Paul Johnson most of those guys would decide to leave the same day.
Rebchuck18
Rebel Legend
Rebel Legend
Posts: 5414
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 11:19 pm
Location: Oxford, MS

VARebelDad wrote:I would like to see Ole Miss think out side the box and go after Paul Johnson. Who???? Paul Johnson (PJ) the current coach at GA Tech. He would bing the triple option with him which he has been very successful winning with at Hawaii, Navy and GA Tech.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Johns ... l_coach%29

I am a graduate of GA Southern University which has six national championship flags flying at our stadium all won with the triple option. Two of those by PJ. We left the triple option and have not been competitive until we hired one of PJ's assistants to bring back the triple option and made a charge for the championship last year and am currently ranked 1st in 1-AA.

Can the triple option win in the SEC? GA Tech is 4-2 playing SEC teams since adopting the TO including wins over Vandy, UGA, and Mississippi State twice. GA Tech is a consistent winner in the ACC with the TO. I think it is a offensive that can be successful without having the top 4 and 5 star athletes that we loose to the bigger programs in the SEC. We can spend a lot of money to get a great coach but we can not buy the best athletes who are picking the bigger programs.

I say hire Paul Johnson and give him a budget to get the best defensive coach he can find and he would create a consistent winner at Ole Miss.
He is 4-3 vs the SEC. He is 1-2 against Georgia (during 3 of GA's meltdown years), and he has two wins against a 4-8 MSU team and a 5-7 MSU team and one win against a 2-10 Vandy team. LSU spanked him in the Chick Fil A Bowl 38-3 because LSU has SEC athletes on defense. The triple option not only will not win consistently against SEC defenses, it will bore the friggin hee bee jeebies out of an already disgruntled bunch of fans.
User avatar
MageeRebel425
Rebel Legend
Rebel Legend
Posts: 3195
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 10:36 pm

Rebchuck18 wrote:
VARebelDad wrote:I would like to see Ole Miss think out side the box and go after Paul Johnson. Who???? Paul Johnson (PJ) the current coach at GA Tech. He would bing the triple option with him which he has been very successful winning with at Hawaii, Navy and GA Tech.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Johns ... l_coach%29

I am a graduate of GA Southern University which has six national championship flags flying at our stadium all won with the triple option. Two of those by PJ. We left the triple option and have not been competitive until we hired one of PJ's assistants to bring back the triple option and made a charge for the championship last year and am currently ranked 1st in 1-AA.

Can the triple option win in the SEC? GA Tech is 4-2 playing SEC teams since adopting the TO including wins over Vandy, UGA, and Mississippi State twice. GA Tech is a consistent winner in the ACC with the TO. I think it is a offensive that can be successful without having the top 4 and 5 star athletes that we loose to the bigger programs in the SEC. We can spend a lot of money to get a great coach but we can not buy the best athletes who are picking the bigger programs.

I say hire Paul Johnson and give him a budget to get the best defensive coach he can find and he would create a consistent winner at Ole Miss.
He is 4-3 vs the SEC. He is 1-2 against Georgia (during 3 of GA's meltdown years), and he has two wins against a 4-8 MSU team and a 5-7 MSU team and one win against a 2-10 Vandy team. LSU spanked him in the Chick Fil A Bowl 38-3 because LSU has SEC athletes on defense. The triple option not only will not win consistently against SEC defenses, it will bore the friggin hee bee jeebies out of an already disgruntled bunch of fans.
I endorse this message...
User avatar
bigtreydaddy
2nd String
2nd String
Posts: 894
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: NEMiss

In closing, bring in Mike Leach aaarrrggghhh
User avatar
carl winslow
3rd String
3rd String
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:06 pm
Location: Jackson, MS

I had a weird Rich Rodriguez prediction a couple of years ago. Not saying I endorse him, but curious if it comes true.
Image
metalinc
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 398
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:20 pm
Location: Omaha,ne

MageeRebel425 wrote:
metalinc wrote:He is 26-14 and they have been to bowls but they have lost each one with losses to LSU Iowa and Airforce. They were 2009 ACC champions..which was stripped by NCAA violations..16-8 in conference..I think he is a good steady winner in conf out of conference so so. I dunno...take a lot of convincing.

The problem with running the triple option is that its not a very sexy brand of football. Its hard for an average fan to get pumped about a triple option offense. I like Paul Johnson and think he is a good football coach but if we are going with gimmicky offenses I would rather have the mad scientist, Leach. Imagine that offense with athletic WRs and backs.. At least I would be confident any given week that my coach would be smarter than the other guy. I know Nutt beat Leach heads up but really our D-line and talent beat Leach. Would want a great D coordinator to come with him though, and he would have to run the ball more a little more in the SEC...
I think you are dead on...with the athletes we have the athletes we recruit in state...we can run the spread...and it needs to be Mouse Davis style fun n gun...with a nice ole miss running back to offset the tempo...that we always seem to get...
User avatar
proud2breb
Rebel Legend
Rebel Legend
Posts: 2969
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2011 10:07 am

User avatar
proud2breb
Rebel Legend
Rebel Legend
Posts: 2969
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2011 10:07 am

metalinc wrote:
MageeRebel425 wrote:
metalinc wrote:He is 26-14 and they have been to bowls but they have lost each one with losses to LSU Iowa and Airforce. They were 2009 ACC champions..which was stripped by NCAA violations..16-8 in conference..I think he is a good steady winner in conf out of conference so so. I dunno...take a lot of convincing.

The problem with running the triple option is that its not a very sexy brand of football. Its hard for an average fan to get pumped about a triple option offense. I like Paul Johnson and think he is a good football coach but if we are going with gimmicky offenses I would rather have the mad scientist, Leach. Imagine that offense with athletic WRs and backs.. At least I would be confident any given week that my coach would be smarter than the other guy. I know Nutt beat Leach heads up but really our D-line and talent beat Leach. Would want a great D coordinator to come with him though, and he would have to run the ball more a little more in the SEC...
I think you are dead on...with the athletes we have the athletes we recruit in state...we can run the spread...and it needs to be Mouse Davis style fun n gun...with a nice ole miss running back to offset the tempo...that we always seem to get...
On the subject of our "athletes":

http://mobile.gulflive.com/site?webredi ... chang.html
Rebchuck18
Rebel Legend
Rebel Legend
Posts: 5414
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 11:19 pm
Location: Oxford, MS

proud2breb wrote:Some of these are realistic:

http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/85 ... candidates
I wanted Holtz when we got rid of Fred Flinstone. Still would like to get him....my second choice is still Kent Austin.
User avatar
kjreb
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 369
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 7:14 pm

whoa did you really say Mike Leach? absolutely not. iv would be all over ESPN and not in a good way. we are already the laughing stock of the sec this year don't make it any worse. mike is a brilliant coach but do you really want a coach with baggage? i want an up and coming hot shot coordinator. someone like Kirby smart. he fields the best defense in the nation every year. one thing we've been missing is a defense. even when Snead threw 20 picks we went 9 and 4 all because of defense. no gimmicky offense please. when was the last Time the wild rebel worked? exactly. defensive minded head coach and pro style oc is what will get us to atlanta imho
heard state's changing field to turf next year. cheerleaders kept eating the grass
User avatar
wpdrebel
Scout Team
Scout Team
Posts: 348
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:47 pm
Location: Alabama

I would take kirby smart or skip holtz. We definately dont need leech, way too many problems with the wanna be pirate. I wouldnt mind kent austin either. But like many have said we have to have a new ad. I would crap a gold brick if Archie would take that job 8O .
For evil to succeed, let good men do nothing.
Post Reply